Cases 21 - 30 of 964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carr v. Seekonk Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv13122
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carr
Defendant:
Seekonk Police Department, New Bedford Police Department, MA Dept of Probation Records and Dept of CJIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nealy v. Shinn, et al.
as 23-4080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES E. NEALY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, R CARR, Deputy Warden at Eyman Complex, SMU 1 Unit, S BRENNAN, Captain/Disciplinary Hearing Officer at SMU 1 and others
Stanley Maday, Jr. v. Kevin Carr
as 23-3275
Applicant:
STANLEY J. MADAY, JR.
Respondent:
KEVIN A. CARR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
US v. Jansen Carr
as 23-4676
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JANSEN V. CARR
Plumley v. Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Defendant:
Blue Apron Holdings, Inc., Jennifer Carr-Smith, Beverly K. Carmichael and others
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Weiss v. Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Blue Apron Holdings, Inc., Jennifer Carr-Smith, Beverly K. Carmichael and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
