Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 49,996
Scales v. New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct
as 24-1483
Plaintiff: WILLIAM SCALES
Defendant: NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Diana Mey v. William Pintas
as 24-1494
Plaintiff: DIANA MEY, on behalf of herself and a class of others similarly situated
Defendant: WILLIAM PINTAS, P&M LAW FIRM, LLC, P&M LAW FIRM (PR), LLC and others
Azcarate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3443
Petitioner: RAY ANTONIO AZCARATE
Respondent: BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03949
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
William Joiner v. Channel 5 LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01160
Plaintiff: William G Joiner
Defendant: Channel 5 LLC, Andrew Callaghan, Evan Gilbert-Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire Interception
United States of America v. SLSCO, LP
as 24-1460
Plaintiff: MICHAEL MCSHERRY and LISA PALMA MCSHERRY
Defendant: SLSCO, LP, DBA Slsco, Ltd., DBA Sullivan Land services, Ltd., BAUMGARDNER HOUSE RAISING, LLC, DBA Baumgartner House Lifting, THE CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Graven v. Snow, et al.
as 24-3420
Plaintiff: WILLIAM A. GRAVEN
Defendant: G. MURRAY SNOW, DISTRICT JUDGE, being sued as an individual and as a federal judge, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE, being sued as an individual and as a federal judge, J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, CIRCUIT JUDGE, being sued as an individual and as a federal judge and others
In re: Cecil William Baxter III
as 2:2024rd00028
USA v. Jatally Williams
as 24-5523
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JATALLY WILLIAMS
Mazurek v. Presto
as 24-1466
Plaintiff: ANDRZEJ MAZUREK, Individual and Executor of Estate of Robert C. Presto
Defendant: CHARLES PRESTO, Individual and Executor of Estate of William Presto

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?