Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Rovner v. Baker Hughes Incorporated et al
as 4:2014cv03416
Plaintiff:
Marc Rovner
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated, Clarence P. Cazalot, Jr., Martin S. Craighead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
United States of America v. Stewart
as 4:2014mc00068
Respondent:
James M. Stewart
Petitioner:
United States of America
USA v. 12000 dollars in US Currency et al
as 3:2012mc00395
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
12000 dollars in US Currency
Claimant:
James Anthony Stewart and Telecom Site Management
USA v. James Stewart
as 12-5693
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES BRANDON STEWART
Thomas Henderson et al v. National Football League et al
as CAC/2:12-cv-04761
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henderson , Kim Anderson , Akbar Gbajabiamila and others
Defendant:
National Football League , NFL Properties LLC , Riddell, Inc. and others
USA v. James Stewart
as 11-5670
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES BRANDON STEWART
Tasman et al v. Brican America, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv23307
Plaintiff:
Stuart Tasman , Paul W. Broome , Mark Gottlieb and others
Defendant:
Brican America, Inc., Brican America, LLC, Brican Financial Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USA v. James Stewart
as 10-40743
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES RUSTIN STEWART
Tasman et al v. Brican America, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01807
Plaintiff:
Stuart Tasman , Paul W. Broome , Mark Gottlieb and others
Defendant:
Brican America, Inc., Brican America, LLC, Brican Financial Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Stewart v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
James E. Stewart
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC and Ally Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
