Cases 41 - 50 of 498
Dale v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC et al
as 4:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Elliot Conrad Dale
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline plc and GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
Robert Lauter v. George Schaefer, III
as 21-2189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LAUTER
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE E. SCHAEFER, III, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE and others
James Martin v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., et al
as 21-11097
Defendant / Appellee:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CHATTEM INC., PFIZER, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MARTIN
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, et al
as 21-10335
Defendant / Appellee:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 630 WELFARE FUND
Richard Sprague v. Sanofi S.A., et al
as 21-10306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD SPRAGUE, individually and as representative of the estate of Brenda Sprague and MARILYN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI S.A. and others
Arthur Cartee v. Boehringer Ingelheim, et al
as 21-10305
Defendant / Appellee:
PFIZER, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR CARTEE
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer v. Cipla Ltd.
as 21-1055
Appellant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC
Appellee:
CIPLA LTD.
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer v. Cipla Ltd.
as 21-1017
Appellant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC
Appellee:
CIPLA LTD.
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer v. Cipla Ltd.
as 21-1018
Appellant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC
Appellee:
CIPLA LTD.
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer v. Cipla Ltd.
as 21-1016
Appellant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC
Appellee:
CIPLA LTD.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
