Cases 41 - 50 of 300
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
James Rankin v. Berrien County, MI
as 21-1721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. RANKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
BERRIEN COUNTY, MI
Pearson v. Home BancShares, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09077
Plaintiff:
Pate Pearson
Defendant:
Home BancShares, Inc., Happy Bancshares, Inc., John W. Allison and others
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, The et al v. McMaster et al
as 3:2021cv03302
Plaintiff:
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, The and Taiwan Scott
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster, Harvey Peeler, Luke A Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rankin v. Lumpkin
as 21-11006
Petitioner / Appellant:
Elton Rankin, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rankin v. Lumpkin
as 21-11007
Petitioner / Appellant:
Elton Rankin, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-2991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Systems Solutions of Kentucky, v. DHL
as 21-2505
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RANKINS
Defendant / Appellant:
SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS OF KENTUCKY, LLC
Defendant:
LUMMUS CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee:
DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC.
United States v. Joshua Rankin
as 21-2678
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joshua William Rankin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
