Cases 71 - 80 of 111
Brown v. eBay Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01134
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Brown
Defendant:
eBay Inc. and PayPal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garon et al v. eBay, Inc.
as 5:2010cv05737
Plaintiff:
Max Garon, Phil Lentsch, Office Dynamics and others
Defendant:
eBay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
IN RE GOOGLE
as 11-M968
Petitioner:
Adobe Systems, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc. and others
Respondent:
Eolas Technologies Incorporated
Amicus Curiae:
Microsoft Corporation, Office Depot, Inc. and Perot Systems Corp.
Vy Hoang v. Ebay, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv08207
Defendant:
DOES, Ebay, Inc., Pierre M. Omidyar and others
Plaintiff:
Vy Hoang
Michael Ewert, et al v. Ebay, Inc.
as 10-80197
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MICHAEL EWERT, on behalf of himself and for the Benefit of all with Common General Interest, any Persons Injured, and all others similarly situated and THE MISSING LINK, INC.
Defendant - Petitioner:
EBAY, INC.
BROWN v. EBAY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04436
Plaintiff:
RICHARD S. BROWN
Defendant:
EBAY, INC. and PAYPAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Brice Yingling, et al v. Ebay, Inc.
as 10-80153
Plaintiff - Respondent:
BRICE YINGLING, DBA Alamo Autosports and ANDY SCOTT
Defendant - Petitioner:
EBAY, INC.
IDT Corp et al v. eBay, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv04097
Plaintiff:
IDT Corp and Net2Phone, Inc.
Defendant:
eBay, Inc., Skype, Inc. and Skype Technologies, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Fernando et al v. eBay, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv01668
Plaintiff:
Devinda Fernando and Vadim Tsigel
Defendant:
eBay, Inc. and Paypal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Malone, et al v. Ebay, Inc.
as 10-15642
:
In re: EBAY SELLER ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MALONE, ANN FARMER and TODD VAN PELT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ENEBELY
Defendant - Appellee:
EBAY, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
