Other Statutes Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 522
MCP No.165, OSHA Covid Rule We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7000
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402 and In re: MCP NO. 165, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ, aka 32BJ SEIU, AFT PENNSYLVANIA and others
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration, JAMES FREDERICK, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration and others
Amicus Curiae: NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, GAVEL PROJECT and others
Intervenor: CHUCK WINDER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the Idaho State Senate, SCOTT BEDKE, in his offical capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives of the State of Idaho, JOSE A. PEREZ and others
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv03970
Plaintiff: State of Louisiana, State of Montana, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Commonwealth of KY, et al v. OSHA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4031
Petitioner: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, JAMES FREDERICK, in his official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Laborfor Occupational Safety and Health and others
Amicus Curiae: MICHIGAN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and MICHIGAN SENATE
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00055
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of Ohio, State of Tennessee and others
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, United States of America, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force and others
Amicus Curiae: American Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State Of Ohio et al v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00675
Plaintiff: State Of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Jessica S. Marcella and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Montana, State of New York, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Martin Robinson v. Jim Simone, et al
as 21-3962
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARTIN ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee: JIM SIMONE, Police Officer, CHIEF OF POLICE TONY CAMPO, DAVID GRAVES and others
Maiya McCoy, et al v. OH, et al
as 21-3964
Plaintiff: MAIYA MCCOY
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARTIN ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF OHIO, OHIO STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION and others
Defendant: ELYRIA, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16711
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
USA v. State of Texas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-50949
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley and Mistie Sharp
Amicus Curiae: State of Indiana, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Not Classified By Court: Constitutional Accountability Center, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice and others
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16645
Plaintiff / Appellee: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellant: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?