Cases 1 - 10 of 3,098
Clark et al v. Mangham et al
as 5:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Mr & Mrs Larry E Clark and L & M Hair Care Products Inc
Defendant:
Mangham Hardy Rolfs & Abadie, Terrence J Donahue, Sr, Charles McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Thompson v. Wolven Threads, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Sarah Thompson
Defendant:
Wolven Threads, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mogan v. State Bar of California, et al.
as 24-3492
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOGAN, ATTORNEY
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, GEORGE CARDONA, in his official capacity as Chief Trial Counsel For the State Bar of California, and in his individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER JAGARD, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief Trial Counsel for the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel and in his individual capacity and others
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mastriano
Defendant:
James Gregory, III, Roland Kuhn, Paul Mazerolle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Delgado v. Raspberry et al
as 9:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Maria Delgado
Defendant:
Sarah Raspberry, Jamie Richardson, Shelly Sitton and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Slazyk v. RRCA Accounts Management, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03888
Plaintiff:
Sarah Slazyk
Defendant:
RRCA Accounts Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sakhi et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2024cv01376
Plaintiff:
SARAH OBIDULAH SAKHI and HAMED AREFI
Defendant:
DEPUTY CHIEF Andrew Schofer, SECRETARY ANTONY J BLINKEN, ASST. SECRETARY RENA BITTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Gulkarov, et al. v. Plum, PBC
as 24-2766
Plaintiff:
LUDMILA GULKAROV, JANINE TORRENCE, KELLY MCKEON and others
Defendant:
PLUM, PBC, a Delaware corporation
Buczek v. Seterus, LLC
as 24-1143
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH A. BUCZEK
Defendant:
SETERUS, LLC, sometimes also assuming the alias of PHH Mortgage, JOHN DOES, said names being fictitious parties intended being possible corporations and/or individuals known or yet to be known involved in any way with this case as Defendants, JANE DOES, said names being fictitious parties intended being possible corporations and/or individuals known or yet to be known involved in any way with this case as Defendants and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
