Cases 1 - 10 of 2,358
Clarke et al v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
as 1:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Kevin Clarke, Trevor Boeckmann, Harry Crane and others
Defendant:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Grant v. Adult Protective Service
as 24-1435
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH GRANT, GRACE GRANT, ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES and others
Defendant:
Police Officer NATALIE BALLATO, Shield #13280, Police Officer JOSEPH DELLIGATTI, Shield #13106, Lt. WILLIAM FIELDS and others
Grant v. Binkley
as 3:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Thomas Grant
Defendant:
Ryan Binkley
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Grant et al v. 115 Precinct et al
as 1:2024cv03714
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Grant and Grace Grant
Defendant:
115 Precinct, Betty Rosa, OSPRA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
