Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Deaton et al v. Stephens et al
as 2:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
D Deaton, T Peake, J. K. D. and others
Defendant:
Patricia Stephens, Agnes Chappell, Alisha Ruffin May and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Miller v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 5:2022cv00485
Plaintiff:
Kevin Miller
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Hill et al v. Meta Platforms Inc et al
as 4:2022cv00001
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc, Facebook Inc, Mark Elliot Zuckerberg and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Catrice Hill, Slade Miller, Wesley Bolton Garmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Milltyme Management LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00831
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Cory Miller and Milltyme Management LLC d/b/a Parlay's Restaurant & Lounge
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller et al v. Coastline Management et al
as 1:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Sauer and Fredrika M. Miller
Defendant:
Coastline Management and Beachcomber HOA Inc., LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller v. Wolfe Jones Wolfe Hancock Daniel & South LLC
as 4:2020cv01642
Plaintiff:
Paulette E Miller
Defendant:
Wolfe Jones Wolfe Hancock Daniel & South LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller v. Nationwide Recovery Service Inc
as 2:2020cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lakeatra Miller
Defendant:
Nationwide Recovery Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller v. Law Office of Brett M. Boreland, PC
as 2:2020cv00247
Plaintiff:
Lakeatra Miller
Defendant:
Law Office of Brett M. Boreland, PC and Law Office of Brett M. Borland PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
