Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Robinson et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 2:2024cv12355
Defendant:
BTN, NCAA, National Collegiate Athletic Association and others
Plaintiff:
Denard Robinson, Shawn Crable, Michael Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Becker, et al. v. TIG Insurance Company, et al.
as 24-443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW BECKER, LAUREN KUEHNE, ADAM CRISWELL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TIG INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurer
USA v. Martin
as 22-40422
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Martin, also known as Aryan Prodigy, also known as AP
Tennant v. Martin et al
as 1:2021cv05632
Plaintiff:
Gregory Francis Tennant
Defendant:
Michael Martin, Davenport Police Department and City of Davenport doing business as 416 N. Harrison St, Davenport, IOWA, 52801
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Memmer v. US
as 21-2220
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFFREY MEMMER, GILBERT EFFINGER, LARRY GOEBEL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Memmer v. US
as 21-2133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY MEMMER, GILBERT EFFINGER, LARRY GOEBEL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Michael Sanders v. Trinity Services Group Incorpo, et al
as 21-15333
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS MOODY, DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, DE LEON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MARTIN SANDERS
Jamero Moses, et al v. Thomas Finco, et al
as 20-2130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM M. JOHNSON, LAMONT BERNARD HEARD and JAMERO T. MOSES
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS G. FINCO, Deputy Director of MDOC, DAVID M. LEACH, Special Activity Coordinator and MICHAEL MARTIN, MDOC Medical Provider
Moulay Tidriri v. Board of Regents, et al
as 20-3240
Defendant / Appellee:
Zhijun Wu, Howard Levine, Jennifer Davidson, also known as Newman and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Moulay Tidriri
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
