Cases 1 - 10 of 1,219
Thielman, et al. v. Kotek, et al.
as 24-3857
Defendant / Appellee:
DENISE GALE FJORDBECK, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff:
MARC THIELMAN, Senator DENNIS LINTHICUM, Senator KIM THATCHER and others
Defendant:
TINA KOTEK, in her official and personal capacities as Governor of Oregon, LAVONNE GRIFFIN-VALADE, in her official and personal capacities as Oregon Secretary of State and MOLLY WOON, in her official and personal capacities as Elections Director
Delivery Kick Holdings, Inc. v. RJ Brooksher LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Delivery Kick Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
RJ Brooksher LLC and Riley Brooksher
Guerra et al v. Minx Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Dessie Pilek, Jessica Hinton, Jessica Golden and others
Defendant:
Minx Holdings Inc. doing business as Minx Gentlemen's Club and Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Lanham Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Styles et al v. The Bank of Missouri et al
as 3:2024cv03137
Plaintiff:
Auria Styles, Tynia Baisden, Chilette Brown and others
Defendant:
The Bank of Missouri, First Electronic Bank, Concora Credit Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Riley v. Nisen
as 24-3016
Plaintiff:
NICOLE RILEY, an individual
Defendant:
SKYLER NISEN, an individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
