Cases 1 - 10 of 979
State Of Texas v. Becerra et al
as 6:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
State Of Texas and State of Montana
Defendant:
Secretary Xavier Becerra, Director Melanie Fontes Rainer, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Elevate Care Country Club Hills, LLC v. Becerra, Secretary of United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity et al
as 1:2024cv04755
Plaintiff:
Elevate Care Country Club Hills, LLC
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Tennessee et al v. Becerra et al
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, State of Mississippi, State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Melanie Fontes Rainer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
American Health Care Association et al v. Becerra et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION;, TEXAS HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION;, ARBROOK PLAZA; and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services;, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES;, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
State of Oklahoma v. HHS, et al
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY OF, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official Capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., EISNER CHIARA and CHIARA EISNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ManhattanLife Insurance and Annuity Company et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
ManhattanLife Insurance and Annuity Company, Paschall and Associates, Inc. and William C. Paschall
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Department of the Treasury, Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Council for Medicare Choice et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Council for Medicare Choice, Fort Worth Association of Health Underwriters, Inc. and Vogue Insurance Agency LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Americans for Beneficiary Choice et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Americans for Beneficiary Choice and Senior Security Benefits, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Pharmaceutical Coalition for Patient Access v. US
as 24-1230
Plaintiff:
PHARMACEUTICAL COALITION FOR PATIENT ACCESS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
