Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 61 - 70 of 22,890
McCrory v. Hamm (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff: Charles McCrory
Defendant: John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reese v. Huggins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff: Cedric Anthony Reese
Defendant: Thomas Huggins and Blake Turman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff: Jamie Mills
Defendant: John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBrahl-Daniels v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00519
Petitioner: Leatrice Malika DeBrahl-Daniels
Defendant: Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Horton v. Richerson et al
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff: Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant: Kelly Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff: Justin Garrett
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Orso v. Jackson
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Ricky A. Orso, Jr.
Defendant: Heath Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Powell
as 7:2024cv00510
Petitioner: Gavin Howard
Respondent: Jordan Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harshaw v. Clemson et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff: Darnell DeMarcus DeDrea Harshaw
Defendant: C/O Clemson, C/O Charlie and C/O Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner: Daniel Dewayne Conner
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?