Cases 1 - 10 of 270
Hunt v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024ct03141
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
Darren G. Jackson, Graham H. Atkinson, Gregory K. Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00520
Petitioner:
Nicholas Gregory Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mendez Palacios v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02061
Petitioner:
Gregori Jerson Mendez Palacios
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Crowder et al v. Burress et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Crowder and Diane L. Crowder
Defendant:
Kimberly Burress, Bethany Herman, Gregory Moss, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deans v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024ct03018
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rashon Deans
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Ashley Gregory and Jhonthan Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Rich
as 5:2023hc02278
Petitioner:
Gregory Reeves
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hay v. PERT Team et al
as 5:2023ct03326
Plaintiff:
Gregory Sunday Hay
Defendant:
PERT Team, J. Greenwood, Billy Cooper, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD v. WELLPATH, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
DAVID RYAN WOOD
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, THE COUNTY OF ROWAN, J. TRAVIS ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. USA
as 3:2023cv00539
Petitioner:
Gregory Allen Lewis
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SIDES v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SIDES
Defendant:
BOBBY KIMBROUGH, JOHN DOE CORPORATION, COUNTY OF FORSYTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
