Miller Act Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
United States of America v. Globalnet and Associates, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv02140
Plaintiff: S.R. Bray, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Power Plus! and United States of America for the Use and Benefit of S.R. BRAY, LLC, a California limited liability company doing business as Power Plus!
Petitioner: Defendant The Gray Insurance Company, a Louisiana corporation
Defendant: Globalnet & Associates, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DLC Electric, Inc., a California corporation, Globalnet and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Titan, Consultants & Engineers, LLC v. Tootle-QRI, LLC, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00129
Plaintiff: United States of America f/u/b Titan, Consultants & Engineers, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and Titan, Consultants & Engineers, LLC
Defendant: Tootle-QRI, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, The Gray Insurance Company, a Louisiana corporation, Tootle-QRI, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use of South Dade Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Inc. v. The Gray Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use of South Dade Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Inc.
Defendant: The Gray Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of McClain Contracting, Inc. v. The Gray Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00034
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of McClain Contracting, Inc.
Defendant: The Gray Insurance Company and Tootle Construction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use of South Dade Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Inc. v. The Gray Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use of South Dade Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Inc.
Defendant: The Gray Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Queen City Sheet Metal and Roofing, Inc. et al v. Allstate Engineering et al
as 2:2021cv08112
Plaintiff: United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Queen City Sheet Metal and Roofing, Inc., A Washington Corporation and United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Queen City Sheet Metal and Roofing
Defendant: Allstate Engineering, a California corporation, The Gray Insurance Company, Bond No. GSA9900021, DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Vulcan Construction Materials, LLC v. ECW Recoveries, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00097
Defendant: ECW Recoveries, LLC, The Gray Insurance Company and Michael Shae Easterling
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Vulcan Construction Materials, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Glen-Gery Corporation v. CDM Smith/Coakley Williams et al
as 1:2015cv01562
Plaintiff: Glen-Gery Corporation
Defendant: CDM Smith/Coakley Williams , CDM Smith Inc. , Coakley & Williams Construction Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Alamo Masonry & Construction Contractors, LLC v. Air Ideal, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00448
Plaintiff: Alamo Masonry & Construction Contractors, LLC
Defendant: Air Ideal, Inc. and The Gray Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Capital Computer Group, LLC v. The Gray Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-15519
Plaintiff - Appellee: CAPITAL COMPUTER GROUP, LLC
Defendant - Appellant: THE GRAY INSURANCE COMPANY
: SERVICE
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?