Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Susan Bozung et al v. Neff Headwear Inc et al
as 2:2016cv05648
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hale Bozung and Susan Bozung
Defendant:
John Does, Mr. Joseph Neff, Mr. Shaun Neff and others
CHG Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Hale et al
as 0:2016cv61038
Plaintiff:
CHG Healthcare Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Elizabeth Hale and MedPartners Locum Tenens, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Henceroth et al
as 4:2016cv00150
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Dale H. Henceroth, Melinda J. Henceroth, Ronald E. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Old National Bank v. Hale et al
as 3:2015cv01242
Plaintiff:
Old National Bank
Defendant:
A. D. Hale and Randall Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hales Machine Tool, Inc. v. Doosan Infracore America Corporation
as 0:2015cv03625
Plaintiff:
Hales Machine Tool, Inc.
Defendant:
Doosan Infracore America Corporation
Hale v. American Taekwondo Association Inc
as 5:2015cv00884
Plaintiff:
Mark A Hale
Defendant:
American Taekwondo Association Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenneth R. Hale v. Evidencia Display et al
as 8:2015cv00538
Defendant:
Does, Embratur Brazilian Tourism Board, Evidencia Display and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Hale
Hales v. Timberline Knolls et al.,
as 1:2015cv02622
Plaintiff:
Lauren M. Hales
Defendant:
Timberline Knolls, LLC, Kimberly D. Dennis, Semone M. West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pruiett et al v. Murphy et al
as 1:2014cv00178
Defendant:
John D Murphy and Linda J Murphy
Plaintiff:
Sherry C Pruiett and Pamela A Hale
Counter_claimant:
John D Murphy and Linda J Murphy
Counter_defendant:
Pamela A Hale and Sherry C Pruiett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Hale County Commission
as 2:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
SE Property Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Hale County Commission, Hale County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
