Cases 51 - 60 of 260,146
10Pearls, LLC et al v. Boardroom One Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
10Pearls, LLC and 10Pearls Ventures LLC
Defendant:
Boardroom One Corporation, Brent Cohen, Kojo Annan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Coles et al v. Konicek & Dillon, P.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Laveranues Coles and Trouble Livin Life, LLC
Defendant:
Konicek & Dillon, P.C. and Esq. Amir Tahmassebi
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 7462 Major adverse actions involving professional conduct or competence
Pak et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 3:2024cv03321
Plaintiff:
Hyun Hee Pak and Yong Su Pak
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
North
as 5:2024mc80134
Plaintiff:
Mr. Gerald D.W. North
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Khodickian v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 2:2024cv04602
Plaintiff:
Sosen Khodickian
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hu v. Wang et al
as 8:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Guixiang Hu
Defendant:
Chunli Wang and Shao Kun Mao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Phillips et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80700
Plaintiff:
Elroy Phillips and Sixtoria Phillips
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ramos v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02412
Plaintiff:
Wally Ramos
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Tobin v. Interlinc Mortgage Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Marquita Tobin
Defendant:
Interlinc Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Sharma v. Komatsu et al
as 1:2024cv11446
Plaintiff:
Sigfried Sharma
Defendant:
Shuhei Komatsu, Taiji Ito, Kiran Sidhu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
