Cases 51 - 60 of 142
WILSON, et al v. PNC BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv00472
Defendant:
Brock & Scott, PLLC and PNC Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Neadella Wilson and Robert Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Teahan v. PNC Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2019cv01113
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A. and John Does 1 and 2
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Teahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LMN Consulting, Inc. v. DAV Acquisition Corp et al
as 1:2018cv01085
Plaintiff:
LMN Consulting, Inc. and LMN Consulting, Inc. doing business as Element Consulting Group
Defendant:
Midcap Financial Services, LLC, DAV Sub, Inc., DAV Acquisition Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
GUERIN v. PNC BANK N.A.
as 5:2018cv04666
Defendant:
PNC BANK N.A. and PNC BANK. NA
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GUERIN
Vare v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 3:2018cv02988
Plaintiff:
Sandi Vare
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sokol-Margolis v. PNC Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv10879
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sokol-Margolis
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A. and PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charlap v. PNC Bank, N.A. et al
as 0:2018cv60574
Plaintiff:
Rose Charlap
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A. and PNC Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dinallo v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 1:2017cv01297
Plaintiff:
David Dinallo
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Campos et al
as 1:2017cv01081
Defendant:
2013 Travis Oak Creek Developer, Inc., Rene O. Campos, Chula Investments, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, N.A., TX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
PNC Bank NA et al v. 2013 Travis Oak Creek GP LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00584
Defendant:
2013 Travis Oak Creek Developer Inc, 2013 Travis Oak Creek GP, LLC, Rene O Campos and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Housing SLP Corporation and PNC Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
