Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jolley v. U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT et al.
as 2:2018cv00647
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely as trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT, Samuel I. White, P.C., Trustee a/k/a Samuel White, Trustee, Samuel I. White, P.C., Trustee and others
Plaintiff:
James K. Jolley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melva Jolley v. Carmax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc.
as 2:2015cv09382
Defendant:
Carmax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Melva Jolley
Jolley et al v. Ledford et al
as 5:2015cv00624
Plaintiff:
G Mike Jolley and Glen M Jolley Family Trust
Defendant:
Jay B Ledford , Neal A Patel , King-Fischer LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jolley v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
Scott Jolley
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , California Reconveyance Company and Albertelli Law Partners, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trinity Valley School et al v. Chesapeake Operating Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01082
Plaintiff:
Trinity Valley School , Rall Properties LP , Rall Oil & Gas LP and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Operating Inc and Chesapeake Exploration LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
The Hanover Insurance Company v. Jolley Building, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
The Hanover Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jolley Building, LLC, Edgar M Jolley and Laura F Jolley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Midland Loan Services v. Jolley
as 6:2011cv01513
Plaintiff:
Midland Loan Services
Defendant:
Rodney V. Jolley
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
William Benton, et al v. Merrill Lynch & Company, et al
as 07-2224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William B. Benton, Frank G. Barton, Jr., James H. Barton and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Merrill Lynch & Company, INC.
Defendant:
Refco, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
