Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Skistimas et al v. Hotworx Franchising LLC et al
as 3:2023cv05974
Plaintiff:
Greg Skistimas and Gabriela Skistimas
Defendant:
Hotworx Franchising LLC, Nancy Price, Patricia Gattuso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC
Defendant:
David L. Smith and Pavel V. Tolstov
DOE et al
as 1:2019cv06520
Plaintiff:
Dave Smith and POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv24552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Brown v. Meiklejohn et al
as 2:2019cv01755
Defendant:
Barbara H Meiklejohn, Todd, Harvey Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE, INC. v. KEYS OF TOPEKA HOSPITALITY LLC et al
as 2:2019cv14575
Defendant:
BRIAN G. SMITH, KEYS OF TOPEKA HOSPITALITY LLC and BRUCE L. ARMSTRONG
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SBS Franchising, LLC v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv01692
Defendant:
Raul Cunarro Rodriguez, Iowa Building Solutions, LLC, Raul Cunarro and others
Plaintiff:
SBS Franchising, LLC
Doe v. St Joseph Community Hospital of West Bend Inc
as 2:2019cv05000
Consolidated Defendant:
J D Smith
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
St Joseph Community Hospital of West Bend Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DogWatch, Inc. v. DogWatch of Sarasota, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10625
Defendant:
Timothy C Smith, DogWatch of Sarasota, Inc. and Dorothy Smith
Plaintiff:
DogWatch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
SPECIAL POLICE ORGANIZATION OF NEW JERSEY v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv08444
Plaintiff:
JABREE BELL, KYLE BROWN, TUWAN FLOYD and others
Defendant:
ANTHONY AMBROSE, CITY OF NEWARK, HARRY ROES (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
