Cases 1 - 7 of 7
UNITED STATES v. 0.1785 acres of land, more or less, situate in Chesapeake, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MSF Investors II, LLC, Arcadia Equity Associates, City Of Chesapeake and others
United States of America v. 5.801 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 1:2020cv00208
Defendant:
Tony Yzaguirre, Jr., 5.801 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, NASSAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Cynthia Stovall v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2016cv09410
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stovall
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 0.391 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2014cv05432
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
0.391 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, MAY STREET MEDICAL, L.L.C. , CUNA MUTUAL INSURANCE SOCIETY and others
Cross_claimant:
CMFG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, mortgage and CUNA MUTUAL INSURANCE SOCIETY
Cross_defendant:
MAY STREET MEDICAL, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 176,071 RENTABLE SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE AND RELATED SPACE et al
as 1:2013cv00886
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
176,071 RENTABLE SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE AND RELATED SPACE, 1441 L ASSOCIATES, LLC, NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
JOHNSON v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC et al
as 2:2009cv70056
Plaintiff:
RONALD W JOHNSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, ACANDS, INC, ACANDS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. USA
as 1:2008cv00605
Plaintiff:
PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
