Cases 1 - 10 of 11
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2019cv00192
Defendant:
BOGG'S MOBILE HOMES, CONSECO FINANCE SERVICING CORPORATION, CAMDEN NATIONAL BANK and others
Plaintiff:
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST
Interested Party:
BUREAUS INVESTMENT GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Boggs et al
as 6:2018cv00070
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ricky Boggs, Unknown Spouse of Ricky Boggs and Housing Development Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Boggs et al
as 0:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
James R. Boggs and Delia M. Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Samuels et al
as 0:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Curtis A. Samuels, Unknown Spouse of Curtis Samuels, Jean Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Boggs et al
as 7:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Marvin D. Boggs and Unknown Spouse of Marvin D. Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Boggs et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 4:2011cv02346
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Boggs and Michelle A. Moquin
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA , Wachovia Mortgage , World Savings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Boggs et al
as 3:2010cv00761
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Daniel R. Boggs and Heidi A. Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Boggs
as 8:2010cv00364
Defendant:
Claude Wayne Boggs
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
USA v. Clinton Boggs
as 09-1738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLINTON J. BOGGS
United States of America v. Boggs
as 1:2008cv00144
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clinton J Boggs
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
