All Other Real Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Freeman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 22-1306
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM R. FREEMAN, III
Defendant / Appellee: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a/k/a JPMC Chase National Assoc., HARMON LAW OFFICES, P.C., JONES MOVING AND STORAGE COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, a/k/a FDIC, KELLER WILLIAMS, LYNN FREELAND and others
Morse v. Federal National Mortgage Association A/K/A Fannie Mae We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00039
Plaintiff: Gregory Carl Morse
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association A/K/A Fannie Mae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RESCAP Securities Holdings v. Nelson, et al
as 16-2086
Plaintiff: FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a Fannie Mae, PATI REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS and GMAC MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC
Plaintiff - Appellee: RESCAP SECURITIES HOLDINGS CO.
Defendant - Appellant: ANNE M. NELSON and PAUL N PAPAS, II
Hurayt et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association, et al
as 3:2016cv00088
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Federal National Mortgage Association A/K/A Fannie Mae and Seterus
Plaintiff: John Gaetano and Christine A. Hurayt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Dale Butts v. Federal National Mortgage Asso
as 13-1752
Plaintiff - Appellant: DALE L. BUTTS, as Register of Deeds of Beaufort County, South Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and JOHN HOPKINS, as Register of Deeds of Richland County, South Carolina, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: GAIL LANEY, as Register of Deeds of Orangeburg County, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JAMES B. HIERS, as Register of Deeds and Clerk of Court of Bamberg County, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RHONDA MCELVEEN, as Register of Mesne Conveyances and Clerk of Court of Barnwell County, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a Fannie Mae, a federally chartered private corporation and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a/k/a Freddie Mac, a federally chartered private corporation
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, Conservator of Federal National Mortgage Association; Conservator of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Helms v. Bank Of America, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv01115
Defendant: Bank Of America, N.A. , Federal National Mortgage Association, A/K/A Fannie Mae and BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. F/K/A Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P.,
Plaintiff: Holly Helms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Walker and All Other Occupants v. Federal National Mortgage Association f/k/a Fannie Mae et al
as 6:2013cv00118
Plaintiff: Jill Yancey Walker and All Other Occupants
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association f/k/a Fannie Mae and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sandoval v. Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae et al
as 4:2012cv03319
Plaintiff: Francisco Sandoval
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gatzka v. Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv02281
Plaintiff: Jason K Gatzka
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae and Bank Of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae
as 2:2012cv00390
Plaintiff: Mike Davis and Betty Davis
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae
Intervenor_defendant: First Tennessee Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?