Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Cooke v. Yates et al
as 6:2017cv00943
Defendant:
Regina 'Doe', Zig 'Doe', Jane Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Esponda et al v. John Does et al
as 1:2017cv21859
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Esponda , Roberto Ramirez and Universal Precious Metals, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Valizadeh v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv03098
Plaintiff:
Daryush Valizadeh
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Does 2-10 and Jane Does 2-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VOGEL v. GO DADDY GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01598
Defendant:
GO DADDY GROUP, INC., JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
JASON G. VOGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valizadeh v. Doe et al
as 5:2016cv05020
Plaintiff:
Valizadeh and Daryush Valizadeh
Defendant:
Doe, Jane Doe and Jane and John Does, 2-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monarch et al v. Gorman et al
as 6:2016mc00024
Plaintiff:
John C. Monarch and Direct Outbound Services, LLC
Defendant:
Richard A. Gorman, Gorman Economics, LLC, Vanguard Economics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Houghton v. Heart et al
as 6:2016cv00010
Defendant:
Earl Heart, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Laurence Houghton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houghton v. Heart et al
as 6:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Laurence Houghton
Defendant:
Earl Heart, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Schmalfeldt v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv00315
Plaintiff:
William M. Schmalfeldt, Sr.
Defendant:
Eric P. Johnson, William John Joseph Hoge, III, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dancy v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00481
Defendant:
Police Officer Chole, City of New York, Police Officer John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dancy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
