Cases 1 - 10 of 102
DAVIS-EL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Defendant:
R. SCOTT ADAMS, DOUGLAS SAMPLE, DEREK ARTIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Madera v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02903
Plaintiff:
Antonio Madera
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Craig W. Tiejen, William Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Jureidini et al v. Evans
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
John A. Jureidini and Rug Life LLC
Defendant:
Douglas C Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Libel, Assault, Slander
Lask v. Rhee-Karn et al
as 1:2024cv02666
Plaintiff:
Susan Chana Lask and Susan Lask
Defendant:
Margaret Rhee-Karn, Douglas Richard Dollinger and Douglas R. Dollinger, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03826
Plaintiff:
ALLAN DOUGLAS WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
(PS) Schwettmann III v. Starns et al
as 2:2023cv02442
Plaintiff:
Dale Schwettmann III
Defendant:
Brook Starns, Rayman Dorman, Daniel Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Douglas v. Yugulis
as 3:2023cv01510
Plaintiff:
Andrew Douglas
Defendant:
Edward Raymond Gollihu Yugulis and Edward Raymond Gollihue Yugulis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Lavery v. Polk
as 1:2023cv01994
Plaintiff:
Mark Lavery
Defendant:
Douglas Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Douglas v. Wegner
as 8:2022cv02560
Plaintiff:
Kristin Douglas
Defendant:
Ryon Wegner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
Excel Sports Management, LLC et al v. Gottlieb
as 1:2022cv06006
Plaintiff:
Excel Sports Management, LLC and Casey Close
Defendant:
Douglas Mitchell Gottlieb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
