Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HUTTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ALLI LARSEN, DREW LARSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUTTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2022cv00896
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ALLI LARSEN, DREW LARSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUTTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ALLI LARSEN, DREW LARSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowens v. Riverwoods Behavioral Health, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00609
Plaintiff:
Jeanell Bowens
Defendant:
Riverwoods Behavioral Health, LLC and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rice v. Turner et al
as 4:2017cv02684
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Rice
Defendant:
Neil Turner, Taggered Boyd, James Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HEINEMANN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
THEODORE HEINEMANN
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SOCIAL SECURITY GUARD ON DUTY 09/08/2016, JOAN LOGAN BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leigh Glicklich v. Betty Bowen et al
as 2:2016cv00441
Defendant:
Betty Bowen
Plaintiff:
Leigh Glicklich
OWENS et al v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN et al
as 1:2008cv01378
Plaintiff:
JAMES OWENS, JAMES OWENS, JAMES OWENS and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Richard Bowen vs. Mescalero Apache Tribe
as 1:2007cv00195
Defendant:
Mescalero Apache Tribe
Plaintiff:
Richard Ross Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
