Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Behnam v. Faheem et al
as 1:2023cv01416
Plaintiff:
Lida Behnam and Lida Behnam doing business as Lida Travel(s)
Defendant:
Tamana Faheem, Lailuma Faheem, Arzoo Faheem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Cooper v. HashtagDMV, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00447
Plaintiff:
Patrick Cooper
Defendant:
HashtagDMV, LLC, John Doe (Bouncer #1) and John Doe (Bouncer #2)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith Rangel Consulting, LLC v. John Doe(s)
as 1:2019cv01577
Plaintiff:
Smith Rangel Consulting, LLC and Mattox Global
Defendant:
John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrissey v. WTVR, LLC d/b/a CBS6 et al
as 3:2019cv00747
Defendant:
WTVR, LLC d/b/a CBS6, Mark Holmberg and John Does 1-10 [WTVR Editors and Publishers]
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Morrissey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alexander v. Diet Madison Avenue et al
as 3:2019cv00688
Defendant:
DMA Doe Defendants 1-17, Patrick Coffee, Adweek, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Alexander
Intervenor:
The Martin Agency, Inc. and The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joong-Ang Daily News California, Inc. v. Janice Cho et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
Joong-Ang Daily News California, Inc.
Defendant:
Janice Cho and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hong v. Mortgage Research Center, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00622
Defendant:
John Doe and Mortgage Research Center, LLC
Plaintiff:
James Hong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blowes v. Cybergenetics Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv01245
Plaintiff:
Devin R. Blowes
Defendant:
Cybergenetics Corp., John Doe 1 and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Does
as 1:2018cv00689
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Johnson
Defendant:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmseth v. Picazio et al
as 3:2018cv00361
Plaintiff:
Timothy Charles Holmseth
Defendant:
Kim Lowry Picazio, William K. Murtaugh, Karen Denise Gaur and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
