Cases 21 - 30 of 35
CHAPMAN v. NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv03640
Plaintiff:
CHANCE CHAPMAN
Defendant:
NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION and INTEGON GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chance v. United States of America
as 8:2017cv00225
Plaintiff:
Tavares Chance
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Wiltz v. D H Transportation Inc et al
as 6:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Chance M Wiltz
Defendant:
D H Transportation Inc , Saowada Ting and American Inter-Fidelity Exchange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens v. Timco Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv01013
Defendant:
Chance G. Andrepont, Timco Services, An Assumed or Common Name, Timco Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Teem v. Doubravsky et al
as 3:2015cv00210
Defendant:
Dennis E. Beeks and Chance E. Doubravsky
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Teem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Knighten v. Pitts
as 5:2014cv00204
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Knighten
Defendant:
Chance Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Glass v. Chance et al
as 1:2014cv00253
Plaintiff:
Wayne B. Glass
Defendant:
James R. Chance and Big G Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClain et al v. Great West Casualty Company et al
as 3:2014cv02252
Plaintiff:
Cassie McClain and Bobby H Chance
Defendant:
Great West Casualty Co , South Wind Express L L C, Krnyic Muradif and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patton v. Doubravsky et al
as 2:2014cv00224
Defendant:
Dennis E. Beeks and Chance E. Doubravsky
Plaintiff:
Jan Marie Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chance v. Gentles et al
as 1:2013cv02468
Plaintiff:
Lesley Chance
Defendant:
Beverly Clarke and Wayne Gentles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
