Cases 91 - 97 of 97
DeShanta Hinton v. Lanham Ford Motor Company
as 08-1774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DESHANTA HINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LANHAM FORD MOTOR COMPANY, PAUL TIMKO, Special Agent for the FBI, KAREN NESTER, Special Agent for the FBI and others
Defendant - None:
JOHN DOE, General Manager, Lanham Ford Motor Company
BALINAO v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 3:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
ARLENE M BALINAO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Knowles, et al v USA, et al
as 4:2007cv00578
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knowles and Louise Knowles
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 5:2007cv00264
Plaintiff:
NORMA PELT TAYLOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Bartolome v. United States of America et al
as 3:2007cv04888
Plaintiff:
D. Brian F. Bartolome
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, William French Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
D Brian F Bartolome et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2007cv01006
Plaintiff:
D Brian F Bartolome, Jennifer Ford and Does 1 thru 10
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Gonzalez-Rucci v. US Immigration & Nat, et al
as 07-1198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSAURA GONZALEZ-RUCCI
Defendant - Appellee:
US IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
