Cases 101 - 110 of 192,032
S.B. v. 3551Joliet, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04864
Plaintiff:
S.B.
Defendant:
3551 Joliet Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
LONGMORE v. CONTINUUM HEALTH ALLIANCE, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv06986
Plaintiff:
THERESA LONGMORE
Defendant:
CONTINUUM HEALTH ALLIANCE, LLC and CONSENSUS MEDICAL GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Harding v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Harding
Defendant:
United States of America
Bovain v. Georges Media Group, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03499
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lavar Bovain
Defendant:
Georges Media Group, LLC, New York Post Publishing, Inc., News Corp Technology, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Coble et al v. TPS Parking Management, LLC
as 3:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Donovan Coble and Kayla Coble
Defendant:
TPS Parking Management, LLC doing business as The Parking Spot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Roy Moore v. Tiana Lowe, et al
as 24-11923
Plaintiff:
ROY STEWART MOORE
Defendant:
TIANA LOWE, JERRY DUNLEAVY, TIMOTHY CARNEY and others
Thompson v. Lowes Home Centers LLC
as 5:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Brad Thompson
Defendant:
Lowes Home Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SMITH et al v. CENCORA, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02558
Plaintiff:
TAMI SMITH and EDWARD SKIBINSKI
Defendant:
CENCORA, INC. and THE LASH GROUP, LLC
Gomez Mireles v. ProStaffing Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04841
Plaintiff:
Eva Gomez Mireles
Defendant:
ProStaffing Services, Inc. and Ryder System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gonzalez v. Red Robin International Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00937
Plaintiff:
Ileana Lopez Gonzalez
Defendant:
Red Robin International Inc and Red Robin Tanasbourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
