Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sammons v. Target Corporation
as 1:2020cv00496
Defendant:
Doe Governmental Entities 1-10, John Does 1-10, Target Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon E. Sammons and George Sammons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Viramontes et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 2:2015at00888
Plaintiff:
Sharon E. Viramontes and Edward G. Viramontes
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Viramontes, et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 2:2015cv01754
Plaintiff:
Sharon E. Viramontes and Edward G. Viramontes
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Richard Laverne Brown , Jacqueline G. Hill , Delphine Murray Williams and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barber v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2013cv01980
Plaintiff:
Sharon E. Barber
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and James
Sharon Barber v. Jacqueline Monroe, et al
as 13-12232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON E. BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION & HOSPITAL, SECRETARY, US DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, JAMES A. PEAK and others
Defendant:
JACQUELINE E. MONROE, Judge
Poeppel, et al v. OmaRail, et al
as 4:2012cv03245
Defendant:
Digger Specialties, Inc. and OmaRail
Plaintiff:
Christopher Poeppel and Sharon E. Poeppel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barber v. Veterans Administration & Hospital et al
as 1:2012cv03462
Plaintiff:
Sharon E. Barber
Defendant:
Veterans Administration & Hospital , Eric K. Shinsheki , James A. Peak and others
James v. Kroger Co. The
as 3:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
Sharon E. James
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sigler et al v. Best Buy et al
as 1:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Sigler and Sharon E. Sigler
Defendant:
Best Buy, John or Jane Doe and Best Buy Co Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
