Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Cheryl Pauley v. Brian Noran
as 22-1036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHERYL A. PAULEY, on behalf of deceased biological son Tavon Pauley, and others next-of-kin, interested, and similarly situated, and friend of this court, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN NORAN, Virginia Secretary of Public Safety, subordinates, subsidiaries, et al., HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC's Director, Subordinates, Subsidiaries, et al. and DR. STEVE HERRICK, VDOC Offender Health Services Director, Subordinates, and medical units levels 1 to 6 subsidiaries, et al.
Owori et al v. Casas-Ganem et al
as 3:2019cv01836
Defendant:
Hip & Joint Specialists of North Texas PLLC, Victor Gomez, Pulmonary & Critical Care Consultants PA and others
Plaintiff:
Gaster Othieno and Adrin Stephen Owori
Not Yet Classified:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baud v. Saman, M.D., et al
as 4:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
Christian Baud , Mallory Baud and Yvonne Bernede
Defendant:
Masoud Saman, M.D. , Saman Facial Plastic Surgery, PLLC , Columbia Medical Center of Plano Subsidiary, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHERMAN v. RIAR et al
as 2:2015cv00444
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. SHERMAN
Defendant:
SANDEEP S. RIAR, M.D. , RANDALL STIGILANO, D.O. , STIGLIANO FAMILY PRACTICE, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Webster v. National Heritage Realty, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
Marcus Webster
Defendant:
National Heritage Realty, Inc., National Heritage Realty, Inc., National Heritage Realty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Stowe et al v. Russell et al
as 2:2007cv00094
Plaintiff:
Douglas Stowe and Stephanie Jackson
Defendant:
David A. Russell, D.C., RV Enterprises, P.C.,, Columbia Medical Center of McKinney, Subsidiary, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
