Cases 1 - 10 of 38
G.D. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03225
Plaintiff:
G. D.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
D.D. et al v. META PLATFORMS, INC., et al
as 4:2022cv06190
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC.,, Facebook, Inc., Snap, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
D. D. and G. D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
G. D. v. Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00200
Defendant:
The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc., a Cardinal Health 414, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
G. D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S.L. et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 4:2012cv00420
Plaintiff:
S. L. , E. B. , N. B. and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlton v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 3:2010cv04344
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Carlton
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , Pharmacia Corporation and G D Searle LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARLTON v. PFIZER INC et al
as 2:2010cv00214
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA CARLTON
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA CORPORATION and G D SEARLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker-Ketch v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 3:2010cv01842
Plaintiff:
DIANE WALKER-KETCH
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , Pharmacia Corporation and G D Searle LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
York v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 3:2010cv01700
Plaintiff:
LARRY YORK, SR
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , Pharmacia Corporation and G D Searle LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER-KETCH v. PFIZER INC et al
as 1:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
DIANE WALKER-KETCH
Defendant:
PFIZER INC , PHARMACIA CORPORATION and G D SEARLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YORK v. PFIZER INC et al
as 1:2009cv00589
Plaintiff:
LARRY YORK, SR
Defendant:
PFIZER INC , PHARMACIA CORPORATION and G D SEARLE LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
