Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Boyd et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00046
Plaintiff:
Richard Boyd and Betty Boyd
Defendant:
John Doe Corporations 1-50, Johnson & Johnson, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. Guinyard et al
as 5:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
Richard Boyd
Defendant:
Elton Latroy Guinyard , Sears Roebuck and Co and Wolverine World Wide Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Brim et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00841
Plaintiff:
Felix Brim , Eric Hudson , Kurt Williams and others
Defendant:
Combe, Incoprated , Combe Incorporated , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. Shuler et al
as 5:2016cv01529
Plaintiff:
Richard Boyd
Defendant:
Elton Shuler, Sears Roebuck and Co , Bates Footwear and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boyd et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04047
Plaintiff:
Betty Boyd and Richard Boyd
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20555
Plaintiff:
Richard Boyd
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy Inc. , DePuy International, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01430
Plaintiff:
Richard Boyd
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy Inc., Depuy International, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ball v. Eli Lilly & Co.
as 1:2007cv01672
Plaintiff:
Glenda Ball, Quinton Avant, Marie Ballarin and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Co., Eli Lilly & Co., Eli Lilly & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ball et al v. Eli Lilly And Company et al
as 4:2007cv00712
Defendant:
Eli Lilly And Company
Plaintiff:
Glenda Ball, Quinton Avant, Marie Ballarin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
