Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ESSEX v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv04952
Plaintiff:
TYLER ESSEX
Defendant:
STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, STARBUCKS CORPORATION, PETROGAS GROUP US, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Recinos et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01362
Plaintiff:
Lacey Recinos and Oscar Recinos
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Pactiv Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dominguez v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Megan Dominguez
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Spector v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2023cv02533
Plaintiff:
Jessica Spector
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McQueen v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Harmony McQueen
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Lynch, et al v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 6:2021cv00795
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lynch and Sandra Lynch
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Pactiv Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morton v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
Briana L Morton
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rafi Haroutounian v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv02422
Defendant:
DOES and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rafi Haroutounian
Raiford et al v. Starbucks Corporation dba Starbucks Coffee Company
as 1:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Michael Raiford
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, TUUCI Worldwide, LLC and TUUCI, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Flemons v. Starbucks Corporation
as 5:2016cv00146
Plaintiff:
Tammy Flemons
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
