Personal Injury: Health Care Cases
Cases 31 - 35 of 35
Karmen Ambarchian et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01911
Plaintiff: Karmen Ambarchian , Veganush Antonyan , Wanda Lane and others
Defendant: Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Karmen Ambarchian et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02929
Plaintiff: Karmen Ambarchian, Veganush Antonyan, Wanda Lane and others
Defendant: Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Artis, et al v. N.E. Compounding Pharmacy, Inc, et al
as 14-1714
Plaintiff - Appellant: SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee: NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC, d/b/a New England Compounding Center, AMERIDOSE, LLC, MEDICAL SALES MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Trustee: PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center
Interested Party: PAIN MEDICINE SPECIALISTS PA, UNIVERSAL PAIN MANAGEMENT MEDICAL CORPORATION, d/b/a/ Universal Pain Management, PAIN ASSOCIATES OF CHARLSETON, LLC, d/b/a InverveneMD and others
Defendant: HOWELL ALLEN CLINIC, DEBRA SCHAMBERG, INSIGHT IMAGING, INC. and others
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN GUZMAN
Interested Party - Intervenor: OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, in the Chapter 11 Case of New England Compunding Pharmacy, Inc
Bequette et al v. Ameridose, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv12429
Plaintiff: Ann Bequette and Walter L. Bequette, Jr.
Defendant: Ameridose LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Intervenor: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caplinger v. Medtronic, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-6061
Plaintiff - Appellant: PATRICIA CAPLINGER
Defendant - Appellee: MEDTRONIC, INC., a Minnesota corporation and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., a Tennessee corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?