Cases 71 - 80 of 89
BRANSON v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES FOR ITS CLUBMAN BRAND, ET AL
as 1:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
MERTON ERIC BRANSON
Defendant:
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, AVOCET ENTERPRISES, INC. , BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
David Rose and Freda Rose
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Knasinski et al v. Air & Liquid System Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jerome Knasinski and Janet Knasinski
Defendant:
Air & Liquid System Corporation , Aldrich Pump Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD. and others
Cross_claimant:
Brand Insulations, Inc. , ITT Corporation , Trane US, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Air & Liquid System Corporation , Aldrich Pump Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harrell et al v. Boeing Co., The, et al
as 4:2014cv00479
Plaintiff:
James Harrell and Edna Harrell
Defendant:
Boeing Co., The , Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc., CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , Boeing Co., The , Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sewak v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00590
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Sewak
Defendant:
Arvinmeritor, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Ltd. , Bird, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
RSCC Wire & Cable L.L.C.
Cross_defendant:
RSCC Wire & Cable L.L.C., Arvinmeritor, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hager v. Asbestos Corporation LTD. et al
as 3:2013cv01324
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hager
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc., Borgwagner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Crane Company , Georgia Pacific, LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Crane Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Wildfire v. Borgwarner Morse TEC, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08632
Plaintiff:
Roger A. Wildfire
Defendant:
Borgwarner Morse TEC, Inc., CBS Corporation, Charles A. Wagner Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Baldwin v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01986
Plaintiff:
Paula Baldwin
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Bird Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Oakfabco Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Oakfabco Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tallman v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01828
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Tallman
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Genuine Parts Company , IMO Industries Inc. , SB Decking Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Genuine Parts Company , 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Fanelli v. Asbestos Corporation LTD. et al
as 3:2013cv01035
Plaintiff:
William Fanelli
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , Trane US, Inc. and Ingersoll-Rand Company
Cross_defendant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Imo Industries, Inc. , Certainteed Corporation and RSCC Wire & Cable LLC
Counter_defendant:
Imo Industries, Inc. , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
