Cases 1 - 10 of 2,243
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Bridges et al v. Eagle Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04392
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Bridges Sr., Lloyd Bridges Jr., Leonard Bridges III and others
Cross Defendant:
Eagle Inc., Viacom CBS, Inc., International Paper Company and others
Defendant:
Taylor Seidenbach, Inc., 3M Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., Northrup Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Foster Wheeler LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Dennis A. Rockwell et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv03963
Defendant:
ViacomCBS Inc., Foster Wheeler LLC, Warren Pumps, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Rockwell and Dennis A Rockwell
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Gary Stern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Williamson v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01391
Defendant:
Cameron International Corp., Industrial Holdings Corporation f/k/a Carborundum Company, Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
WOOLARD et al v. CARRIER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv00410
Plaintiff:
LARRY WOOLARD and ANNE WOOLARD
Defendant:
CARRIER CORPORATION , CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY (DELAWARE) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. Advanced Composites Group et al
as 3:2015cv01009
Plaintiff:
John Clark and Michele Clark
Defendant:
Advanced Composites Group, AERCO International, Inc., Aii Acquisitions, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
Lennox Industries, Inc. , Saint-Gobian Abrasives Inc. , Aii Acquisitions, LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., AWC 1997 Corporation, Advanced Composites Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Clark et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00995
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation , Advanced Composites Group, Aii Acquisitions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Clark and Michele Clark
Cross_claimant:
Ameron International Corp. , Chicago Bridge & Iron Company , General Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Ameron International Corp. , Chicago Bridge & Iron Company , AERCO International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tucker et al v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joe Donald Tucker and Cora May Tucker
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., All Acquisitions, LLC, Air & Liquid Systems Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Afton Pumps, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00140
Defendant:
Afton Pumps, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation, Ameron International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ellis
Cross_claimant:
Crane Co. , Ingersoll-Rand Company , The Gorman-Rupp Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Crane Co. , A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Nesser et al v. Advanced Composites Group et al
as 3:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nesser and Karen Nesser
Defendant:
Advanced Composites Group, AERCO International, Inc., Allied Manfacturing, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , AERCO International, Inc., Advanced Composites Group and others
Cross_claimant:
ITT Corporation and Crane Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
