Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Deborah Sarver et al v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01883
Defendant: Hyster-Yale Group, Inc., Standard Motor Products, Inc., WELCO Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff: Deborah Sarver, Jeremiah Sarver and Sabrina Sarver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George Kruse et al v. Actuant Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09540
Defendant: OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GTE SYLVANIA successor-in-interest to PHILCO-FORD), HARCOSEMCO LLC (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to HARCO LLC f/k/a HARCO LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED), LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION d/b/a LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to MARTIN MARIETTA) and others
Plaintiff: George Kruse and Shigeko Kruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Arthur Putt et al v. CBS Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv06909
Plaintiff: Arthur Putt and Janet Putt
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, Forest River, Inc., Does 1-850 inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Houston v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00157
Defendant: Foster Wheeler, LLC, The Boeing Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Sherrie Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Houston v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2019at00066
Defendant: Honeywell International Inc., f/k/a Alliedsignal Inc., as success-in-interest to the Bendix Corporation, The Boeing Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Sherrie Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
In re Toy Asbestos Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00325
Plaintiff: AGNES TOY, THOMAS TOY and Thomas H. Toy, Sr.
Defendant: Copes-Vulcan, Inc., Genuine Parts Company, National Automotive Parts Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Toy et al v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00326
Defendant: Alfa Laval, Inc., Standard Motor Products, Inc., Smothers Parts international and others
Plaintiff: agnes toy, Thomas h. toy, sr, Thomas H. Toy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Toy et al v. Honeywell International Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00336
Defendant: Viking Pump, Inc., Standard Motor Products, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff: AGNES TOY, THOMAS TOY and Thomas H. Toy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Randolph Morton et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv05956
Defendant: Schneider Electric USA Inc, Union Carbide Corporation, -, CBS Corporation (f/k/a VIACOM, INC., successor by merger with CBS CORPORATION f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION and as successor-in-interest to BF STURTEVANT) and others
Plaintiff: Edna S. Morton and Randolph Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?