Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Ayotte v. The Boeing Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02662
Defendant: The Boeing Company , A.W. Chesterton Company, H.B. Fuller Company and others
Plaintiff: Daniel L Ayotte
Cross_claimant: The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company , The Toro Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_defendant: Daniel L Ayotte , United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC and others
Counter_claimant: Industrial Holdings Corporation , MTD Products, Inc. and Tenneco, Inc.
Counter_defendant: United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC , Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant: AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff: RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox, Sr. v. AGCO Corporation, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00084
Defendant: AGCO Corporation, Star Machine & Tool, SPX Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Cox, Sr, Jack Howard Cox, Sr., Valerie M. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Coiro v. American Honda Motor CO., Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03183
Plaintiff: Coiro and Philip J. Coiro
Defendant: American Honda Motor CO., Inc, Honeywell International, Inc., American Honda Motor CO., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Fish v. Ford Motor Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00496
Plaintiff: Fish, Robert C. Fish, Helen Thomas-Fish and others
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, CBS Corporation of Delaware as successor to Westinghouse Electric Corp. also known as CBS Corporation doing business as Viacom, Inc., Pneumo Abex, LLC and others
Cross Defendant: Akebono Brake Industry Co., Ltd. and CBS Corporation of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Carmen Villanueva v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00183
Defendant: 3M Company, FCA US LLC, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff: Carmen Villanueva, Daniel Villanueva and Diane Deatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Wrongful Death
SMITH et al v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY,INC.,et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00943
Plaintiff: LEONARD SMITH and SUSAN ELIZABETH SMITH
Defendant: AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. , AUTOZONE, INC., BENJAMIN MOORE & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freddie Beauchamp Jr. v. American Honda Motor Company Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00827
Defendant: Genuine Parts Company, Pines Trailer Corporation, CNH America LLC and others
Plaintiff: Freddie Beauchamp, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
SHINDELBOWER et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv60001
Plaintiff: ROBERT SHINDELBOWER and CONSUELO SHINDELBOWER
Defendant: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GENUINE AUTO PARTS COMPANY, CSK AUTO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Shindelbower et al v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv05324
Plaintiff: Robert Shindelbower and Consuelo Shindelbower
Defendant: Honeywell International, Inc., Genuine Auto Parts Company, CSK Auto, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?