Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Davis et al v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
Heather Davis and Richard L. Burgy, Jr.
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patera v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 3:2016cv50188
Plaintiff:
Marci Patera
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. , CitiMortgage, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patera v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv06270
Plaintiff:
Marci Patera
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, PENNSYLVANIA v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00672
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. , MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC. , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHERMAN v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv01672
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY H. SHERMAN
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holland et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 4:2015cv02097
Plaintiff:
George Holland and Melissa Holland
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Brown v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 1:2015cv22051
Plaintiff:
Devon A. Brown
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Peppy Martin v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al
as 15-5338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEPPY MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and FARM CREDIT SERVICES OF MID-AMERICA FLCA
Preston, et al v. CitiMortgage, et al
as 15-6057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAIAH PRESTON, JR. and DONETTA PRESTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., MIDWEST MORTGAGE CAPITAL, LLC and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Grayer v. Ford Consumer Finance et al
as 1:2014cv10187
Plaintiff:
Mary Anne Grayer
Defendant:
Ford Consumer Finance, CitiMortgage, Inc. and CitiFinancial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
