Cases 31 - 40 of 399
Garner v. Crescent Bank & Trust (Louisiana) et al
as 1:2023cv02409
Plaintiff:
Kelly Renee' Garner
Defendant:
Crescent Bank & Trust (Louisiana), Brian Donahue and Stephen Notarianni
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Easoon USA, LLC v. Kelly et al
as 1:2019cv00564
Defendant:
David S. Osterman, Mark Clifton, Brett Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Easoon USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Greene et al v. Johnston
as 4:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Debra L Greene and Kelly Pytluk
Defendant:
Ada Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Kelly v. Treasury Department IRS
as 3:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Dolores Kelly
Defendant:
Treasury Department IRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Kelly v. Bank of America
as 3:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Dolores Kelly
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Kelly v. Welfare
as 3:2023cv00690
Plaintiff:
Dolores Kelly
Defendant:
Child Welfare Services and Welfare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Haymond v. Lovevery, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Kelly Haymond
Defendant:
Lovevery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Abel et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
Abel, Stanford Kauffman, Bradley J Davis and others
Defendant:
Willis of Colorado Inc, Willis Ltd and WGH Holdings Ltd
Interested Party:
Ralph S Janvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Kelly v. Michaels Stores, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Amber Kelly
Defendant:
Michaels Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Haymond v. Lovevery, Inc.
as 1:2023at00193
Plaintiff:
Kelly Haymond
Defendant:
Lovevery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
