Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Peacock v. Capital One Bank et al
as 9:2018cv80061
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Ivanivna Peacock
Defendant:
Capital One Bank and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Samuel Shipkovitz v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage
as 17-2230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL SHIPKOVITZ, And Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
DOVENMUEHLE MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED and RICHARD CORDRAY, Director U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Defendant:
EVERHOME MORTGAGE, INC., THOMAS J. CURRY, U.S. Comptroller of the Currency and EDITH RAMIREZ, Chairwoman of Commission U.S. Federal Trade Commission
Scott Robinson v. Consumer Financial Protection, et al
as 17-1458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT E. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU and ELIZABETH WARREN
Cope v. Tower Loans et al
as 5:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Frances Denise Cope
Defendant:
Tower Loans and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 1:2016cv02183
Plaintiff:
Scott E. Robinson
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Elizabeth Warren
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. S/W Tax Loans, Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00299
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Navajo Nation
Defendant:
S/W Tax Loans, Inc , J Thomas Development of NM, Inc. , Jeffrey Scott Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CFPB v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.
as 15-1761
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Defendant - Appellant:
ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU v. ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Defendant:
ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
