Antitrust Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Mississippi Collision Repair Association et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv00537
Plaintiff: Mississippi Collision Repair Association , John Mosley , Clinton Body Shop and others
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Partstrader, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
SIMMONS v. PFIZER, INC.
as 3:2012cv04031
Plaintiff: STEPHEN DEWAYNE SIMMONS , DENISE MCCLINTIC , JUDITH DEPIPPO and others
Defendant: PFIZER, INC., PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Defendant: ALPHA THERAPEUTIC CO, BAXTER HEMOGLOBIN THERAPEUTICS, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF IOWA, COUNTY OF GREENE, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Interested Party: OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, LLC, EXCELLUS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, KLINE & SPECTER, PC and others
Defendant / Appellee: PHARMACIA CORPORATION, PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., KREMERS URBAN DEV. CO. and others
Not Classified By Court: M. JOYCE HOWE, COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE and others
Petitioner / Appellant: CORINNA CONNICK
Plaintiff: THERESE SHEPLEY, LARRY YOUNG and STATE OF VA
Cheeks of North America, Inc. v. Fort Myer Construction Corp., et al
as 11-7117
Plaintiff - Appellant: Cheeks of North America, Inc., CNA
Defendant - Appellee: Fort Myer Construction Corporation, Francisco Rodrigues Neto, Jose Rodrigues and others
CHEEKS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01746
Plaintiff: CHEEKS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Defendant: FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, FRANCISCO RODRIGUES NETO, JOSE RODRIGUES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant: VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant: VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
CHEEKS v. FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02163
Plaintiff: JOHN C. CHEEKS
Defendant: FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, FRANCISCO RODRIGUES NETO, JOSE RODRIGUES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Type: Other Statutes None
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Conway et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00571
Plaintiff: VIBO Corporation, Inc., VIBO Corporation, Inc. and VIBO Corporation, Inc.
Defendant: Jack Conway, Troy King, Talis J. Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?