Cases 51 - 60 of 197
Letricia Lavern Brown v. The State of California et al
as 2:2023cv01966
Plaintiff:
Letricia Lavern Brown
Defendant:
SOUTH CENTRAL LOS ANGELES REGIONAL CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS, INC., erroneously sued herein as LOS ANGELES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, The State of California, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
HCA Healthcare Inc v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 2:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
HCA Healthcare Inc
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
In Re: Auction Houses Anti., et al v. , et al
as 1:2000cv00648
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robert A. Daly, Jr., Ronald Black, Vicki Haberman and others
Claimant:
N.B.S. Diamonds, Inc., Seymour Stein, Louis Glick Diamond Corp. d/b/a Louis Glick & Co. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Sotheby's Inc., Christopher M. Davidge, Abraham & Associates and others
Defendant:
Fataihi Company of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, A. Alfred Taubman, Swicorp, S.A. and others
Interested Party:
United States Of America and The United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff:
J&J Lubrano, Giovanna Terruzzi, Pamela Alper and others
Petitioner:
Boies, Schiller & Flexner, L.L.P.
Plaintiff:
Herbert Black
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Henry et al v. Brown University et al
as 1:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Sia Henry, Michael Maerlander, Brandon Piyevsky and others
Defendant:
Brown University, California Institute of Technology, University of Chicago and others
Petitioner:
United States of America and New York, State of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Humphrey v. Desmond et al
as 1:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Montay Desmond Humphrey
Defendant:
Conor P. Desmond, U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III)
as 3:2017md02801
Defendant:
Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III), Panasonic Corporation, KEMET Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Chip-Tech, Ltd., Michael Brooks, Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated and others
Respondent:
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Aptiv Services US, LLC
Intervenor:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Quathimatine Holdings, Inc., HP, Inc. and Dell Inc.
Claimant:
Certain Members of Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Settlement Class
Interested Party:
Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Stephanie Turner v. McDonald's USA LLC, et al
as 22-2334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHANIE TURNER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
MCDONALD'S USA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
United States et al v. Google LLC
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, State Of Virginia, State of California and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2007cv05634
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jung, David Murphy, Justin LaBarge and others
Defendant:
Air France, S.A., Qantas Airways, Ltd., All Nippon Airways and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Amy Yang, Xanadu Corp and David Gould
Claimant:
Michael Chekian
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Deslandes v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04857
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, McDonald's Coporation and McDonald's USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Leinani Deslandes
Respondent:
ADP, Inc. and Paychex, Inc.
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
