Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Ivy Creek of Tallapoosa LLC et al v. Multiplan, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03900
Plaintiff:
Ivy Creek of Tallapoosa LLC d/b/a Lake Martin Community Hospital administrator Lake Martin Community Hospital and Elmore Community Hospital Rural Health Association d/b/a Elmore Community Hospital administrator Elmore Community Hospital
Defendant:
Multiplan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Martin-Landers LLC et al v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 2:2024cv11185
Plaintiff:
Martin-Landers LLC d/b/a Mark Martin Ford and Martin-Landers Imports LLC d/b/a Mark Martin Kia
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Compagnie Gnrale des tablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Martin, et al., v. Texas Association of Realtors, Inc., et al.
as 4:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Julie Martin, Mark Adams and Adelaida Matta
Defendant:
Texas Association of Realtors, Inc., Austin Board of Realtors, San Antonio Board of Realtors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ALEXANDER v. HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH et al
as 2:2019cv18287
Defendant:
HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH, HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH PALISADES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION, MD KEVIN A SLAVIN and others
Plaintiff:
MD FREDERICK ALEXANDER and Pediatric Surgicalcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2017md02773
Defendant:
Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation and Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hart, All Plaintiffs, Michelle Mackay and others
Not Classified By Court:
Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd, SYNNEX Corporation, Best Buy Co., Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Jennifer Milici
Interested Party:
Huawei Device U.S.A. Inc., Sequans Communications, Inc. and Avanci LLC
Petitioner:
NVIDIA Corporation and InterDigital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2007cv05634
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jung, David Murphy, Justin LaBarge and others
Defendant:
Air France, S.A., Qantas Airways, Ltd., All Nippon Airways and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Amy Yang, Xanadu Corp and David Gould
Claimant:
Michael Chekian
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. LOCKHEED MARTIN et al
as 1:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN and AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
