Cases 1 - 10 of 209
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Watson Realty Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J. Arko and Andrew M. Moore
Defendant:
Watson Realty Corp., Premiere Plus Realty Co., Charles Rutenberg Realty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Arc Realty LLC
as 2:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J Arko and Andrew M Moore
Defendant:
Arc Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Foos et al v. Permian Resources Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00361
Defendant:
Permian Resources Corp., Centennial Resource Development, Inc., Chesapeake Energy Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Foos, Andrew A. Hund, Michael B. Ackerman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rosenbaum et al v. Permian Resources Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rosenbaum, Reneldo Rodriguez, Thomas Caron and others
Defendant:
Permian Resources Corp. f/k/a Centennial Resource Development, Inc., Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Continental Resources Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Brian Courtmanche, Laura J Faber, Patricia Mancieri and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Andrew Caplen Installations LLC et al v. Permian Resources Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Defendant:
Permian Resources Corp., Centennial Resource Development, Inc., Chesapeake Energy Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Caplen Installations LLC and Edward Allegretti doing business as Alfred Auto Center
Interested Party:
Daniel Rosenbaum, Reneldo Rodriguez and Thomas Caron
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Merck Mumps Vaccine Antitrust Litigation
as 23-3089
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHATOM PRIMARY CARE PC, ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, DR. ANDREW KLEIN and JOHN IVAN SUTTER, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
MERCK & CO INC
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. The National Association of Realtors et al
as 1:2023cv05392
Plaintiff:
Janet Phillips, Joseph Hunt, Edith Anne Hunt and others
Defendant:
The National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Inc., HSF Affiliates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner:
MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master:
JOSE L. LINARES
In Re:
LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor:
MYLAN INC.
Interested Party:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff:
Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent:
State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party:
Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
