Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
IN RE NAMENDA INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv06549
Plaintiff: Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund and A.F. of L.- A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan
Consolidated Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and MSPA Claims I, LLC
Petitioner: JM Smith Corporation
Defendant: Actavis, plc, Forest Laboratories, LLC, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH & Co. KGaA and others
Consolidated Defendant: Allergan plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
In Re: Actos Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv03278
Plaintiff: American Sales Company, LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
IN RE ACTOS END PAYOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2014cv02846
Defendant: Actavis plc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund and Teamsters Union Local 115 Health & Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff: United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant: Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court: All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv07488
Defendant: Merz GmbH & Co. KGaA., Actavis, plc, Forest Laboratories LLC and others
Plaintiff: JM Smith Corporation On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company
Interested Party: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd.
Not Classified By Court: AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
In re: Sensipar (Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019md02895
Not Classified By Court: UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund, Actavis Pharma Inc., Cipla Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Cesar Castillo, Inc. and KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
In Re: In re: Sensipar (Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets) Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. AMGEN, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01460
Plaintiff: KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. and KINNEY DRUGS
Defendant: Actavis Pharma Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND et al v. AMGEN INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01461
Defendant: Actavis Pharma Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Plaintiff: TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES' BENEFIT FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cesar Castillo, Inc. v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00396
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amgen Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. AMGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01510
Plaintiff: KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. and KINNEY DRUGS
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., AMGEN, INC., ACTAVIS PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?