Antitrust Cases
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02960
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff: MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Interested Party: GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00429
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Plaintiff: MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC. et al v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv03565
Plaintiff: BELLCO DRUG CO., FWK HOLDINGS, LLC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP. and others
Defendant: ACTAVIS HOLDCO, U.S. INC, ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party: MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff: KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified: MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2009md02084
Plaintiff: George Steven Legrand, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Maxi Drug, Inc. doing business as Brooks Pharmacy and others
Counter Defendant: Meijer Inc and Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
In Re: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
Defendant: Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Perrigo Company, Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Respondent: King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., Prescription Supply, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: Paddock Laboratories Inc
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Meijer Inc et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00958
Counter Defendant: Meijer Inc
Respondent: Dik Drug Company, J.M. Smith Corp. d/b/a Smith Drug Company, Miami-Luken, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp. and others
Defendant: Par Pharmaceuticals Inc, Paddock Laboratories Inc, Solvay Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00956
Petitioner: Besins Healthcare, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp. and others
Defendant: Actavis, Inc., Par Pharmaceuticals Inc, Paddock Laboratories Inc and others
Respondent: Burlington Drug co., Miami-Luken, Inc., Value Drug Company and others
Counter Defendant: Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC vs. CEPHALON, INC., ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2006cv01797
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SALES CO., INC., BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY, INC., CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and others
Defendant: BARR LABORATORIES, INC., BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CEPHALON, INC. and others
Petitioner: TADEKA PHARMACEUTICAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?